first tests: \sim super/subscript looks strange
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 4:09 pm
Just after short testing:
A couple of papers where mathtime pro was used before
compiled Ok, looks Ok too.
\notin good;
zswash works, looks good.
\sim symbol looks strange in super- or subscript
as 10pt base size is used
(as a white small \sim symbol inside a black "background"
wave-like figure of size of a normal symbol).
If needed, I'll send a screenshot.
P.S. Just checked: the same bad-looking \sim
occurs in the previous mathtime version (not II);
the adobe ps interpreter in HP LJ 4MP gives
the same, oddly looking result.
A couple of papers where mathtime pro was used before
compiled Ok, looks Ok too.
\notin good;
zswash works, looks good.
\sim symbol looks strange in super- or subscript
as 10pt base size is used
(as a white small \sim symbol inside a black "background"
wave-like figure of size of a normal symbol).
If needed, I'll send a screenshot.
P.S. Just checked: the same bad-looking \sim
occurs in the previous mathtime version (not II);
the adobe ps interpreter in HP LJ 4MP gives
the same, oddly looking result.